I'm
sooo elated the NHL and its players association have come
to a tentative agreement, so they can get to work on a season of
exciting pro hockey again. I can hardly wait to rush out and buy
tickets . . . to the official Alberta KENO pro hockey lottery game.
Or
not.
Being
a retired person on a limited income, I might be able to afford a
pair of tickets to perhaps one NHL game a year, or one oversized
jersey that would look ridiculous two days after the player named on
the back was traded to a team in a city that never sees
snow.
Or
I could spend the same dough and have two days with my wife
cross-country skiing in the mountains. No contest. The mountains win.
But
I still like to consider myself a fan of the Oilers, much in the same
way I like to consider myself a social drinker. You know, a personal indulgence that's not considered unacceptable behaviour.
So
I might be persuaded to attend a sports bar once a year, hoist a
brew, have a burger, watch a game with friends — and put five bucks
or so into a KENO game, hoping to recover my investment.
The
Wildrose Party might have a winner with its idea of promoting a KENO
lottery game, with the bulk of the profits from the first five years
of operation going toward funding shortfalls for new arenas for both
the Edmonton Oilers and Calgary Flames.
But
a number of assumptions have to pan out before we can be assured NHL
hockey can survive in this province — and that players with
multi-million-dollar contracts can have the designated benefits
pension package they so desperately need.
First,
the government needs to accept that the Wildrose proposal has merit.
All that's required there is goodwill, and an insider's agreement
with the numbers.
As
the proposal has been presented, rolling out the KENO game into
sports bars and lottery kiosks shouldn't be too difficult or
expensive.
After
that, an increase in consumer spending of $196 million a year on lotteries
would need to be realized, and sustained for at least five years.
If
you believe that NHL hockey has a long-term future in Alberta without
requiring provincial tax subsidies for the infrastructure needed to
host the teams (beyond what the cities themselves are willing to
spend), you need to believe in all of the above.
For
true fans, that shouldn't be difficult. But for the rest of us?
Credit
needs to be given in this space to Jason Gregor, TV host,
play-by-play announcer and curator of the Oilersnation web site. His
work saved commentators (like me) the time needed to dig up the
relevant numbers, to get a perspective on the potential of a KENO
lottery for Alberta. Check his site, and read the comments on his
interview with Wildrose leader Danielle Smith; both are illuminating.
We
already knew that Albertans spend way more than the national average
on lotteries. Per capita, lottery spending is highest in the three
prairie provinces, making gaming a major revenue source for our
respective governments.
Profits
on the $737 Albertans spend on gambling per year go toward a host of
non-profit societies province-wide, as well as into general
government revenues. Neither pot can afford a decrease right now.
It's
ironic, but Alberta's unique policy of dedicating gambling profits
toward community non-profits rather than keeping all the money in
general revenues, keeps thousands of dedicated volunteers and paid
staff addicted to VLT revenues. Without that money, fundraising would
become a lot more desperate around here.
So
if a KENO game were instituted and actually made the $196 million a
year projected, it's asking a lot of Alberta's gamblers not to let
that figure be a decrease in other lottery profits. Or a whole lot
more people with bad personal problems might eventually become
homeless.
Here's
how the KENO money is proposed to be divided. Of total sales, $137
million is paid in prizes. Five million goes to admin (a low figure,
in my estimation). Another $5 million is divided between the Oilers
and Flames foundation charities (it's hard not to be jealous of
that). And $20 million a year for five years goes to the teams to
subsidize new arenas.
After
five years? Danielle Smith suggests profits might go
to municipalities for recreation infrastructure. But I can't see CFL
teams, soccer teams, pro lacrosse or baseball teams failing to reasonably ask
for a slice of the pie.
For
true believers, anything can be made to look possible. The question
is: how much are casual fans like me (and there are lots of us, I
think) prepared to believe?
No comments:
Post a Comment