By
most accounts, Nigel Wright is a standup guy. By most accounts, Senator Patrick Duffy is not.
When
news of Wright's $90,000 “gift” to Duffy passed through the fan
over the May long weekend, Wright (wealthy enough on his own account)
resigned from his job as the prime minister's chief of staff.
Duffy,
whom we are told could is too poor to wangle a $90,000 bank loan,
despite having at least two residences and a base pay of $135,000 a year plus generous perks, keeps his job.
And
the fan continues to churn, while the prime minister who appointed
Duffy and defended him through a week of dubious explanations of bad
judgement, unclear legal requirements of Duffy's job — and possible
malfeasance — stands in the fan's exhaust.
If
you published this plotline in a comic book, only its
followers would believe it. And only then for entertainment value.
Duffy's
bread was buttered for decades as a CTV Parliament Hill chief
correspondent on stories that fall far short of his own for
unbelievability. But he expected Canada to believe the following:
• That
the reporting requirements of what constitutes a “residence” for
the purposes of obtaining a Senate housing allowance are so unclear, he
could not even determine the spirit of the rule;
• That
billing expenses for Senate work, while on vacation in Florida was a
“clerical error;”
• That
the $90,000 Duffy used to make an internal audit on his conduct "go
away" was a loan he obtained on his own;
• That
repaying the $90,000 housing allowance he collected “in error”
satisfies the questions that triggered the audit, and that he no
longer needs to co-operate with it;
• That
he did not double-bill taxpayers for Senate pay, while he was being
paid by the Tory Party as an election campaign fundraiser;
• That
he still deserves to sit as a Senator and collect his pay.
Over
the weekend, CTV's Robert Fife reported the Senate’s internal
economy committee originally found Duffy broke “very clear” and
“unambiguous” residency rules. A sanitized version of that
report was published, leaving out that bit, leaving Duffy and others under scrutiny
some wiggle room to save their jobs, if not their reputations.
Fife
also reported Duffy's lawyers attempted to have him exempted from the
Senate committee's forensic audit. In what has arisen since, one
needs to ask why.
Are
there other instances of double-billing and clerical errors that
Duffy wishes would not become public?
Wright,
who until Sunday was the most powerful unelected person on Parliament
Hill, has been spun as a close friend of Duffy, concerned with the
embattled Senator's poor health. So close, that he handed over
$90,000 of his own money to Duffy, to remove the onerous stress of
poverty that would follow repaying the illegally-obtained housing allowance
on his own.
Without
telling prime minister Stephen Harper.
This
is not credible on a number of fronts.
First,
agents of Parliament do not give other agents of Parliament “gifts”
of $90,000. That just stinks from the outset, not to mention that the
gift was made while the receiver is facing a forensic audit by an
ethics committee.
Second,
insider sources are saying Wright and Duffy may be close, but not $90,000
close.
Third,
it is out of the realm of believability that micro-manager Stephen Harper
would not know about this, or would approve of such a gift, unless
there were reasons far beyond poor Duffy's health for keeping
skeletons in the closet.
Another
nationally-known former news correspondent, Pamela Wallin has also
resigned the Conservative Senate caucus while the audits are being
conducted. Tory Senator Patrick Brazeau is fighting a ruling his
$48,000 needs to be repaid, while he also fights allegations of a
violent sexual assault.
And
Liberal Mac Harb is indignant over his $51,000 housing tab.
A
comic-book writer could spin a yarn about a politician who got
elected promising Senate reform, while appointing sleazebags into a
system chiefly upheld by insider advantage, if not outright
corruption.
And then defending them, while his brilliant and honourable lieutenant falls on his own sword.
And then defending them, while his brilliant and honourable lieutenant falls on his own sword.
But
you'd have to be a comic-book subscriber to believe it could actually happen.
Follow
Greg Neiman's blog at readersadvocate.blogspot.com
No comments:
Post a Comment