Monday, 1 December 2014

CWB sale: Something for nothing and money for free

I've never been a fan of the Canadian Wheat Board. Growing up on a small mixed farm, I gained my resentment of the CWB, the railways and the quota system by osmosis.

If there was value in any of these, my dad and my family never saw very much of it.

So I shed no tears in 2012, when the Harper government put an end to the CWB monopoly. But as a taxpayer, I at least expected some payback when it would be privatized. As would, I assumed, the prairie farmers whose forced sales of their wheat and barley had built the CWB into a global grain marketing power.

Now, we discover, that won't be the case.

In addition to the marketing contacts and expertise within the CWB, there are physical assets that must be evaluated when the marketing entity goes public.

But as early as 2011, news reports quote federal ag minister Gerry Ritz saying the CWB has no assets. So, what about the 3,400 rail cars? Or a couple of Great Lakes freighters, or the four high-throughput elevators the CWB hastily ordered into construction?

The transition from public board to private business is necessarily being done in secret. The minister uses his executive powers to control all financial information about the status and operation of the CWB.

That much seems necessary. But I thought the government was doing this to protect my interests as a taxpayer. According to recent news reports, not so much.

Reports say Ritz also denies the government “owns” the CWB. The government fired the farmer-represented board, and appointed their own selected board — and they don't own it?

They gave the CWB $349 million in taxpayer dollars to facilitate the transition to private ownership, and the government says taxpayers have no stake or share in its assets?

And that, whoever ends up owning the CWB before the government-set deadline in 2016, for whatever price, neither farmers nor taxpayers will see a cent of it?

Right now, if you are a farmer who sells grain to the CWB this year, you are eligible to set up a contract, under which, for $5 a tonne of delivered grain in the future, you will get partial ownership of the CWB.

In other words, producers will be allowed to pay for their tiny slice of the new organization that will grow out of the CWB, but the new majority owners (most likely one of the U.S.-based transnational giants) will not put up one cent of the purchase price.

Taxpayers will get zero for their investment into the CWB. Prairie farmers whose forced sales created the assets the CWB now owns, get nothing.

And the Harper government sees this as a good deal.

I opposed the sale of Petro-Canada. It was a bad deal then, and looking back, taxpayers would have been a lot better off as owners of an integrated energy company, than as sellers of it.

As it stands now, the national oil companies of France, Norway and China own and control more energy assets in Alberta than Albertans do.

But at least we (the owners) got something back when Petro-Canada was privatized.

From the few facts available about the privatization of the Canadian Wheat Board, we get nothing.

A group of Saskatchewan farmers formed the Farmers of North America, which spun off Genesis Grain and Fertilizer. NFA claims about 10,000 members, and they put up a bid to buy the CWB, which they apparently valued at $270 million.

That bid was rejected, with no reason given.

Another group of farmers launched a lawsuit, saying over $17 billion in value simply disappeared when the CWB monopoly disappeared. That case will be heard in spring.

When the whole CWB privatization debate was ongoing, there were experts (and others) presenting facts about grain sales that could make your head spin.

But there was the gut acknowledgement that forced monopoly grain sales for Canadian prairie grain and for no one else, was wrong.

Expect further spin when privatization is summarily announced.

But it appears the gut acknowledgement that farmers and taxpayers would get some cash value from this will go by the boards.

That's wrong, too.

No comments:

Post a Comment