“Let's not be mistaken, the people
who are seeking refuge are not the barbarians. They are fleeing the
barbarians.” — Nicolas Chapuis, French ambassador to Canada
Saskatchewan premier Brad Wall wants
prime minister Justin Trudeau to suspend his plan to bring 25,000
Syrian refugees into Canada by the end of the year. He fears that
such an accelerated program would allow a few Islamic State
barbarians to slip through the screening process.
How you can do more than what the
United Nations has already done to pre-screen for families (as
opposed to single young men), already separated from the unscreened
refugees flooding Europe's borders, is hard to say. Suffice that any
process would fall short of 100-per-cent security.
But in setting that as some kind of
standard, Wall is building a wall of fear and suspicion around all
Muslims — which is exactly what experts tell us the barbarians want
from us.
Creating an underclass of people among
us — and providing tacit government permission to hate and distrust
them — makes it that much easier for recruiters to convert young
people already here into becoming the terrorists we fear from abroad.
But one thing Wall's letter to the
prime minister accomplished immediately was to expose the divisions
already separating Canadians over the issue of fast-tracking
immigrants from a war-ravaged country where not a whole lot of us can
really tell if any faction there can be deemed “the good guys.”
I followed the news coverage of this
story posted by major news outlets in Canada: CBC, CTV, The Globe and
Mail, National Post and Maclean's.
In every case, the story about Brad
Wall's letter was presented fairly and evenly. A lot of people like
to complain that Canada's news media is inherently biased (invariably
against them, whatever their position on any issue may be). But I saw
no such bias in their coverage, which supposedly will become the
primary information source for most Canadians on this issue.
Where the bias played — and it played
huge — was in the comments section.
I don't pretend to know if — or how —
online each news media moderates the comments that appear at the
bottom of stories. Most often, I don't read them. People should have
better things to do than walk through the valley of the trolls.
But this time, I looked at the comments
below the stories, and here's what I found — at least in the news
window of Monday afternoon. I found a wall. Between Canadians.
On the CBC site, the posted reactions
were almost completely to reject Wall's request that we suspend the
refugee program. A (very few) supported Wall's request, but
overwhelmingly, readers were appalled that a Canadian political
leader would say what he did.
Comments on the CTV site, on the other
hand, were virtually 100-per-cent Brad Wall-for-prime-minister. Even
if under an assumed name, it seemed nobody wanted to challenge the
group.
Readers of the Globe story seemed more
willing to see two sides of an issue, but generally, the comment
consensus was that Canada should push ahead with the refugee program.
Maclean's only had one posted comment.
Maybe their filtering system is more rigid, or maybe more Canadians
wait to read Maclean's in print than online. But that comment
rejected Wall's request.
I repeat, the news stories themselves
were entirely balanced and should not elicit the kinds of comments
that appeared. Not on their own, anyway; this is a reflection of
readership, not of journalism.
National Post, for their part, did
something outstanding, in my view. They interviewed surviving people
who went through our last similar epoch of fear and racism: Jews who
fled Europe to Canada at the outbreak of the Second World War. One
had escaped the Dachau concentration camp, ended up in Canada, and
spent years under armed guard as a suspected enemy of Canada.
If anyone would have reason to not be a
Nazi sympathizer, it would be these Jews (plus a few communist
academics and homosexuals fleeing persecution in their homelands).
Frederick Blair, immigration minister
at the time, was determined to keep Jews out of Canada by any means,
but shiploads of prisoners of war — including at least 2,300 Jewish
civilians — found themselves behind barbed wire in Canada. One prison camp was called the Plains of Abraham camp. Doubly ironic, when you think about it.
It speaks to the times that these young
men did not become suicide bombers, but rather a group of upstanding
Canadians after the fact. But the infuriating unfairness and racism
behind their imprisonment cannot be explained away by that.
Wall's request is far too close to
Frederick Blair's campaign for comfort. That Canada turned away
shiploads of Jewish refugees during the Second World War to their
deaths does not speak well of us trying to do the same today with
Syrians.
Many Canadians may not know who the
“good guys” are in the fighting in Syria, but we do know the
refugees are not the bad guys.
Ultimately, morally and politically, we
are obliged to let them in.
No comments:
Post a Comment