It's too easy to simply get angry when
province after province — and including the federal government —
sells special access to governors as a partisan fundraiser.
If you want to believe that government
acts on behalf of groups that make large donations and not on behalf
of the people that voted for them, you need look no further than
that. Special, exclusive — and paid — access to lawmakers damages
the legitimacy of elections, and brings our whole concept of
democracy into contempt.
Not to say that very many Canadian
governments haven't sunk to that level. They have. But when they're
caught, parties of all stripes learn that offering private interviews
to wealthy clients in return for generous donations comes at a price.
That's why six of our provinces, most
recently Ontario, have proposed or passed laws limiting the size of
donations that can be made, and limiting the list of who can be
donors.
In Alberta not long ago, when it became
widely known that municipalities and tax-supported institutions were
regularly sending donations to the long-ruling Conservatives, that
insidious practice was stopped.
In Saskatchewan, Canada's last bastion
of Wild West fundraising rules, there's no cap on how much
corporations or unions can donate to political parties. In fact,
out-of-province groups have sent millions to Brad Wall's Saskatchewan
Party (by far, mostly from Alberta).
You can even set up a numbered
corporation in Alberta and donate unlimited amounts to a political
party in Saskatchewan, making it much more difficult for any average
voter to know who is behind the donation. You can gather that money
from anywhere, and who would know?
So when Brad Wall opens his mouth in
opposition to Canada's efforts to mitigate climate change, whose
voice is really speaking?
So let's go ahead and put a tight cap
on political donations. (Quebec, which has been stung by perceptions
of influence peddling, now has a cap of just $100 per year for
political donations. That's a full third more than the Quebecers'
median donations to charity, but there you are.)
But be careful how you do that. Money
and power are the co-joined twins of politics everywhere, and it
would take better surgery than that to make some room for justice and
equity.
The reason why is right in front of us.
In early January, Kellyanne Conway, the
manager of US president-elect Donald Trump's poisonous election
campaign, will be come to Alberta for a paid speech to Calgary
business leaders. And for a tour of the oilsands projects at Fort
McMurray.
Personally, I'm hoping for minus 40
with a howling windchill for that week, but climate change,
unpredictable it is, will likely disappoint me.
I don't object to her visit or her
speech. I object to the reason for it.
She was invited to headline a
fundraiser for a new group called the Alberta Prosperity Fund. It's
our version of America's political action group (PAC) and their
billionaire-run big brothers, the Super PACs.
This is what we'll get if we ban or cap
political donations without thinking things through. Alberta
Prosperity Fund, managed by longtime Tory insiders, has chosen Jason
Kenney to become leader of the Alberta Progressive Conservative Party
— and there's not much inside it that appears to be progressive.
Their web site claims need for action
because of all the “special interest groups” that are currently
running our whole society into the ground, according to the fund's
backers.
Those enviro-pinkos who oppose
pipelines for instance; they have a lot of money behind them, right?
Ditto those obstreperous native groups. Same with those
bleeding-heart refugee-lovers.
If we didn't like groups with special
interests giving big donations to parties that support their views —
out in the open where it's all easily seen — we're really going to
hate shadow groups who claim no official party affiliations, but
support just the opposite.
It's called free speech and freedom of
association.
You can't separate money from power in
the dark. It's hard enough to do that in the light of day.
As the federal Liberal Party has amply
shown us, the current fundraising rules can be stretched pretty far.
At least now, when they are stretched to the point of abuse, we can
know who's done it — and punish them if we want to.
No comments:
Post a Comment