A book review:
Title: How Cycling Can Save the World
By Peter Walker
Published by TarcherPerigee
Of course cycling cannot save the
world. The question of that is far more complex, involving getting
past climate change denial, economic and social inequality, a looming
cost-of-health-care crisis and the built-in resistance of city
planners, traffic engineers and elected leaders.
Even so, respected Guardian columnist Peter
Walker makes a convincing and easily-read case for leaving our collective salvation
to billions of people worldwide riding bikes.
More than half of all people now live
in cities, most of which are clogged with motor traffic and the
pollution of motor traffic. Too many people spend too much time
sitting at a desk, burning an ever-larger portion of their incomes
supporting the vehicle they feel is needed to get them to work, and
their children to school. And it is killing them early.
Walker opens his book with an
exhaustive look at alarming studies into the cost of our modern
sedentary lifestyle. He suggests health officials are not kept awake
nights worrying about the cost of early deaths due to sitting around
too much: obesity, heart disease, strokes, diabetes, kidney disease,
Alzheimer's, etc. (these add up to roughly the combined populations
of Alberta and Saskatchewan every year, about equal to global deaths
caused by tobacco). Rather, they worry about the
multi-trillion-dollar cost of morbidity from these diseases — the
spending of health resources needed to keep these sick people alive.
Walker references the Barnet Graph of
Doom, which was drawn to determine the date when health care costs in
a county in northern England would consume every dollar of all taxes
raised — in their case, 2022.
If these diseases could be cured and
prevented in pill form, the inventor would gain an instant Nobel
Prize, and reap billions instantly from selling it. Yet that “silver
bullet” (as designated by the U.S. association of cardiac surgeons)
already exists virtually for free, available to all, in the form of
active transportation.
Cycling is, after all, active
transportation in its most efficient form.
To bring that to a local perspective,
read the letters and articles in the paper regarding the provincial
government's denial of a cardiac unit for the Red Deer hospital. The
argument could be made that if a tiny fraction of the cost of such a
unit had been made in better street planning and cycling
infrastructure in just the last decade, Red Deer might not need one.
Ditto expanding our costly dialysis services.
From health, Walker moves to issues of
social inclusion. The more opportunities that low-income people have
for movement in cities, the more our cities become truly inclusive.
When cycling moves from being a hobby for wealthy lycra-clad weirdos
to a genuine alternative for people moving through their daily lives,
the happier, more free and democratic a city becomes.
This is particularly true, Walker
notes, for women, children and the elderly.
From there Walker moves to issues of
safety. There is that radioactive issue of helmet laws — as one
city councillor noted, touch it and you die. But Walker's research
contends that if you think helmets and high-visibility clothing are
the answer to a perceived (and erroneous) view that cycling is
dangerous, you have asked the wrong question.
The safest place on earth to ride is in
Amsterdam, where you will see very little high-viz lycra, and very few
helmets. Check that against Australia and New Zealand where strict
helmet laws exist simply to keep people off their bikes.
Helmets do not make a mass cycling
culture safe. Separation from cars, properly planned intersections
and thoroughly connected bike routes do.
How safe is safe? In places where this has been studied the most, basically, safe is safe where you can let an eight-year-old ride to school and back, unaccompanied.
And where these are built, even their
most ardent champions were amazed at how quickly cycling as a portion
of total commutes exploded. As in trips doubling twice or four times over
in a few years.
Walker noted boroughs where cyclists daily lifted bikes over barriers on uncompleted sections of
bike routes still under construction. That phenomenon is happening
today in Red Deer on 55th Street east, where the paved
bike lane ends 20 metres short of its intersection with the new bike
route heading south on 20th Ave. Dozens of bike tracks can
be seen in the mud, and were there even when a barrier was set up
last summer closing the last kilometre of finished pavement, short as
it ended up being.
I'm a biased reviewer, and I'm not sure
cycling can save the world all by itself. But I am convinced the
stubborn and short-sighted attitudes that raise barriers to people
feeling safe in exercising their health and economic choices will
probably doom it.
Follow Greg Neiman's blog at
Readersadvocate.blogspot.ca
Well said, Greg Neiman. But then I'm biased too! I embraced active travel to work for the last 30 years of my career, and in retirement ride my bicycle �� even more in getting to where I need to go. I always tried to live within a half hour walk of the office (for winter) and rode from March to the end of October. But now I have studded winter tires on my beater bike and can have fun all year round!
ReplyDelete