On Saturday, I had the opportunity to
be a speaker for one of the films featured at this year's Justice
Film Festival at Red Deer College. That allowed me to preview the
movie Human Harvest.
The preview was chilling, the research
that followed was depressing and the second viewing at the festival
was saddening. In all, several evenings well-spent.
Released in 2014, the muiltiple-award-winning film presents a disturbing picture of the world's favourite potential trade partner: China. It also raises serious questions about our collective complicity — a turning-of-the-eyes away from a program of mass murder within China's health care system, where thousands of prisoners of conscience are harvested every year, and their organs sold to “transplant tourists.”
While the world's developed countries
have years-long wait times for patients needing a new liver, kidneys,
corneas, or a heart, for $30,000 and up, you can get replacement
parts in China in a couple of weeks. China has no functioning
organ-donor registration system, but somehow they can find you a
tissue match, from a living donor, within a few days.
As the movie heartlessly points out,
the donors are not willing— they are pulled from a prison system
that houses tens of thousands of mostly Falun Gong religious
practitioners. Uighurs, Muslims, Christians and criminals bound for
execution round out the roster, but the overwhelming harvest is of
Falun Gong believers.
It's a billion-dollar industry which
could not exist in this scale in any other country without global
attention and outrage. But — because it's China — trade
delegations turn a blind eye, looking more to profits in the world's
second-largest economy.
The movie follows a report compiled in
2006/07 by former MP and secretary of state David Kilgour, and David
Matas, a respected immigration and human rights lawyer. Their efforts
won them a Nobel Peace Prize nomination in 2010, and the ongoing
enmity of China.
One question that immediately comes to
mind on seeing the film is: why hasn't the world heard about this? I
like to think of myself as reasonably informed, but I had no idea
this gruesome industry existed in China and I doubt many others of
general society were that much ahead of me.
While by no means a well-kept secret,
why hasn't this issue come to wider discussion?
Another question: Why have there been
no international sanctions for what is by any definition a crime
against humanity?
In 2009, Liberal MP Borys Wrzesnewskj
introduced a private members bill making it illegal for Canadians to
get a transplant abroad if the organ was taken from an unwilling
donor. I couldn't find any evidence that bill ever passed.
Should such law ever pass, a Canadian
discovered to have travelled to buy a kidney or a heart could be
prosecuted as a participant in a murder.
Kilgour and Matas say we should go
further. They want the names of all the doctors and nurses in all the
hospitals in China that annually kill thousands of people in order to
sell their organs, so we can prosecute them in an international
court.
It's no less a crime against
humanity than the Holocaust, and indeed, Matas and Kilgour draw
parallels. First, you demonize and dehumanize the victims, as was
done in pre-war Europe, or in intertribal conflicts in Africa and the
Middle East. Then, you have people simply remain silent about
atrocities.
Wrzesnewskj, who has proposed and
supported a wide variety of human rights causes over the years,
particularly in the Ukraine, himself trod lightly on the Chinese
tiger's tail.
He said that although Canadians benefit
from trade with China, and that we want even more trade in the
future, “it does not exonerate us for addressing the issue of organ
transplantation in the People's Republic of China.” Well, yes, but
. . .
He warned against “trusting a country
that would engage in this sort of horrific crime against its own
people.” Do feel warned?
I would suggest that in any country
other than China, such a program of mass-murder-for-profit would
result in global trade sanctions, if not military invasion.
And once you know about this, a share
of the responsibility falls on you.
No comments:
Post a Comment