If
Alberta adopted the tax regime of any other province, it would
collect at least $10.6 billion more a year in revenue. Thus saith the
provincial treasury and finance board.
But
Alberta doesn't need to collect $10.6 billion more in revenue a year,
does it? That's because they can allocate $10,500
per person per year in programs, services and capital projects, by
simply spending every cent of oil and gas royalties, as they come in.
When
energy prices are high (as they are now), there's lots of money to
spend, and no reason at all to save. When energy prices drop, we just
have austerity and pray God for another boom.
That's
the Alberta way. We hold to it as an article of faith.
As
a portion of income versus public spending, Albertans pay less taxes
than almost anyone. People in Arab sheikdoms might pay less, but when
you consider the general abundance of wealth, versus taxation and
publicly-built infrastructure, we get as close as anyone can to a
free ride into a modern, egalitarian economy.
So
why would Alberta even bother to house tax policy experts of national
renown, like Jack Mintz of the Calgary School of Public Policy at the
University of Calgary, and colleague Philip Bazel? Must be for the
export value.
Mintz
and Bazel are suggesting that most Albertans can get away with paying
no income tax at all, and that our free-world low corporate tax rate
could be cut even more.
All
we need to do is forsake our religion. Institute a provincial sales
tax, and harmonize its collection with the federal GST.
Sorry,
but Albertans' souls have already been sold to the royalty gods. We
don't switch religions, just because the new one is cheaper and more
fair. And we definitely, definitely, won't save for a future when oil
royalties might decline or disappear.
In
other modern economies, the accepted wisdom is that lower personal
and corporate tax rates serve to encourage investment. A
generally-applied sales tax discourages consumption. Put together,
they set the stage for long-term economic growth.
But
very few other modern economies can drill for money straight out of
the ground, so conventional wisdom doesn't really apply here.
Here's
what we would get, if we fell down and worshipped Mintz and Bazel's
report calling for a sales tax of 8 per cent, harmonized with the
federal GST:
• a flat income tax rate of 9 per cent, instead of 10;
• no income taxes at all, for Albertans with taxable incomes lower
than $57,250 — or a couple with a combined income of less than
$114,500. (That's 70 per cent of us, by the way);
• a cheque to all low income Albertans to rebate their spending on the
sales tax;
• corporate sales taxes lowered from 10 per cent to 8.43 per cent.
The
downside of having the HST is that it punishes people on low incomes
and small businesses.
The
low-income burden falls mostly on people working part-time for
minimum wage, or youngsters on an allowance. They wouldn't get the
HST refund, because they don't make enough money to even file tax
returns. Defninitely a consideration (and an incentive to file anyway).
Small
businesses would have to absorb the extra cost and time burden of the
paperwork involved with the HST. But, really, the GST, already built
into most accounting systems, would merely be switched to HST, at 13
per cent. The feds do the rest.
Discouraging
spending with the HST is also bad for small businesses, because most
mom-and-pop businesses are small retail enterprises. Where's the
first place where consumers cut spending? Restaurants and coffee
shops — small businesses.
But
if an Alberta couple has $10,000 more disposable income (or more),
because there's no income tax, don't you think they'd go out for
coffee more often, not less? Do they really think we're all going to
rush out and just buy stocks all of a sudden?
The
Canadian Restaurant and Food Services Association reports very little
change in sales, in areas where the HST has been adopted.
Even
good old Jim Dinning, former Alberta finance minister headed up a
blue-ribbon panel to examine B.C.'s ill-fated HST. They found that
the HST would create 24,000 better-paying jobs by 2020, if they would
keep it. The B.C. economy would be $2.5 billion larger with an HST,
than with GST and a provincial sales tax, collected separately.
Low-income
people were also found to be better off with the HST.
But
we know what happened in B.C., don't we? Voters killed the HST.
Taxes
are as much a matter of burning faith as cold economics. Our Alberta
religion forbids even talk of it.
For
better or for worse (and mostly for the better), the wisdom of the
masses trumps that of nationally-renowned tax experts.
No comments:
Post a Comment