I think foreign affairs minister John
Baird reacted rashly when he put the kibosh on yet another hint that
the British protectorate of Turks & Caicos would be amenable to
becoming Canada's 11th province.
Perhaps he was just distracted. Baird was in Ukraine at the time , with, as it happens, the current MP championing the idea of annexing
T&C, Edmonton East MP Peter Goldring. Both were assisting the international effort to ensure fair and free elections
there.
Bad timing, I guess. But Turks &
Caicos have a history of that when it comes to the annexation idea.
The last time that issue arose, the Tory government of the day was
also distracted — by free trade negotiations with the United
States. Not a time for aggrandizement in the Western Hemisphere.
Back then, all three parties in Nova
Scotia voted to include the tropical islands — with their miles and
miles of beautiful beachfront — into their own province, to, you
know, help bring them into the Canadian family.
This time around, Saskatchewan premier
Brad Wall beat them to the punch. He wants the islands to be part of
his province.
“Canada needs a Hawaii,” he said
last week, after the idea rocketed to front of mind with the visit of
T&C's premier (and tourism minister) Rufus Ewing.
Officially, Ewing visited Canada last
week to open a trade office in Toronto, but as a head of state, he
was obliged to visit the cold portals of Ottawa as well. Of course,
as soon as the microphones were turned on for the press, questions
flew about the idea of annexation.
Ewing smiled and said his objective was
trade talks. Really. But he would not close the door to the idea of
annexation, even if an exasperated and distracted John Baird couldn't
slam closed it fast enough.
A time out, please, Mr. Baird. Let's
give people a chance to think about this. Well, another chance,
really. We've been thinking about it since 1917 when Robert Borden
proposed the idea. Should have done it then, really.
Although the United States provides the
lion's share of the more than 200,000 tourists who flock to the
island (since they can't hop a small jet to nearby Cuba), Canada is
the archipelago's largest economic partner.
More than 42,000 Canadians visit the
islands every year, which is more than the combined population of
natives on the islands.
Outside of tourism, Turks & Caicos
is a politically stable, friendly offshore banking centre. Which
might explain the government's official reluctance to cozy up to
them.
If Canada is T&C's top trading
partner, and that trade is offshore banking. . . well, you get the
picture.
But all the more reason to make those
foreign banks Canadian, and tax them, wouldn't you think?
Right now, the string of 40 islands,
only eight of which are inhabited, is experiencing a population boom.
And it isn't natural growth.
Good old Wikipedia reports that for the
most recent year they have on record (2008), there were only 450 live
births on the island, and 390 deaths. And that was peak natural
growth.
But since the turn of the century, the islands' population
has grown by more than half, from just under 20,000 in 2001 to more than
31,000 today. Almost 60 per cent of the people living in Turks &
Caicos today are recent immigrants.
Being a British protectorate, their
health care system is similar to ours, with a national health plan
paid for out of payroll deductions, and a mix of public and private
care delivery. Pretty much like us.
They have an elected governing body,
with four appointees made by the governor from Britain.
And get this: Turks & Caicos is
closer to Ottawa than Edmonton. Direct flights from our frozen cities
would be easy, and we could breeze through to the beaches, without
needing the irritation of a passport or customs search. No duty-free shopping on
the way back, though.
We already have a growing population of
people from cricket-playing cultures. Maybe it's time we studied the
rules.
Considering our base of expats from
India, the Philippines and other countries, mixed with newly-Canadian lifetime players from Turks & Caicos. . . I see the basis for a pretty
strong national team.
At the very least, we would absolutely
clobber the Americans.
Reason enough to give this a second
thought. Or, in our case, a fourth.
Follow Greg Neiman's blog at
readersadvocate.blogspot.ca.
No comments:
Post a Comment